Thursday 26 March 2015

One year jail term for internet fruadster



Justice Sabiu Yahuza of the Federal High Court, Dutse on Tuesday, March 24, 2015 convicted and sentenced one Bello Dominic Oizamisi to one year imprisonment with hard labour on a one-count charge of obtaining by false pretence brought against him by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC.

Bello , a student of Federal Polytechnic Auchi, Edo State allegedly fraudulently displayed a car for sale on the internet, in which one Abdul-Azeez Abdul-Rahman eventually showed interest in buying. In the course of negotiation, the convict allegedly demanded from Abdul-Rahman, the sum of one hundred thousand naira (N100,000.00) to be used for registration, auction papers and clearance of the car. The money was wired to him through his account in one of the new generation banks. After an endless wait for the car to be delivered, it dawned on the victim that he had been scammed.  Hence, he petitioned the EFCC.
 
The count reads:
“That you Bello Dominic Oizamisi on or about 21st day of January, 2013 within the Jurisdiction of the Federal High Court, Dutse knowingly retained the sum of One Hundred Thousand Naira (100,000.00k) being proceeds of an illegal act on behalf of Oluyeba Peter Ozaveshe and Dominic Ozamisi being the sum obtained under false pretence from one Abdulazeez  Abdurrahman for registration, auction and clearance papers of a nonexistent car, and you thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 17(a) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (Establishment) Act 2004 and punishable under Section 17(b) of the same Act”.
 
When the charge was read to him, he pleaded guilty.
Upon his plea, counsel to EFCC, Musa Isah urged the court to convict the accused accordingly.
 
Justice Yahuza consequently convicted and sentenced him to one year imprisonment with option of one hundred thousand naira (N100, 000.00) as fine.
 

EFCC arraigns Father, Son for Internet Scam

foreigners invade Nigeria with cocaine


PRESS RELEASE





The National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) is investigating the involvement of a Tanzanian and four Nigerians in trafficking substances suspected to be ephedrine and cocaine weighing 30.673kg. The Tanzanian was nabbed while attempting to smuggle 25kg of ephedrine to South Africa on a Kenya Airline flight while the other four suspects were apprehended with 5.673kg of cocaine during an inward screening of passengers on an Emirates Airline flight at the Nnamdi Azikiwe International Airport (NAIA) Abuja.
 
The NDLEA Airport commander, Hamisu Lawan gave the names of the suspects as follows; Sekwoa Morris Mackindoshi, caught with 25kg of ephedrine, Eneh Chinedu Innocent, found with 1.534kg of cocaine, Nzube-chukwu Amaizu John, ingested 1.349kg of cocaine, Okafor Onyeka Obiajulu, found in possession of 1.642kg of cocaine and Udechukwu Pascal Onyeka who was arrested with 1.148kg of cocaine.
 
 The Tanzanian was caught with 25kg of substance suspected to be Ephedrine packed in thirteen sachets in a travel bag. He was arrested during an outward security checks while intending to board Kenya Airline flight through Nairobi to Johannesburg. The other four suspects were nabbed with 5.673kg of cocaine from Sao-Paulo, Brazil. Total weight of seized drugs is 30.673kg. Apart from the Tanzanian that hid 25kg of ephedrine in his luggage, other suspects ingested various quantities of cocaine found on them Hamisu stated.
 
The Tanzanian, Sekwoa Morris Mackindoshi in his statement said that he came for a musical concert in Nigeria. “I am a Tanzania. I came for a musical concert in Lagos. I was given the bag containing the drug by a Nigerian and a white man I met at the Lagos airport. I was to deliver the bag to someone in South Africa but unfortunately, I was arrested here” Sekwoa explained.
 
The Chairman/Chief Executive of the NDLEA, Ahmadu Giade said that the Tanzanian will be charged under the NDLEA Act. “The Tanzanian arrested in connection with drug trafficking will be charged in line with the provisions of the NDLEA Act. NDLEA has respect for the rule of law and like other suspects, the Tanzanian is entitled to an attorney as well as all rights and privileges due to him under the law” Giade stated.
 
Investigation is on-going and the suspects will soon be charged to court.
 
 
Ofoyeju Mitchell
Head, Public Affairs
08034088136

How many controversies shaped 2015 election






Emeka Ibemere
Obviously, all have not been heard concerning the 2015 general elections as the gladiators and their supporters continued to reel out controversies after controversies, ahead of March 28 and April 11. It’s on record that no election in recent times has generated much heated controversy than the 2015 polls.
As at last count, no fewer than five topical controversies have been raised so far as next week’s election draws near.
Contemporary controversial issues borders on postponement of the election date, PVC distributions, use of soldiers to monitor election, to the purported plan to sack Jega, the Independent National Electoral Commission, to Card Reader disagreement and other sundry controversies have dominated the elections.  
Political pundits pontificated that going into the election with controversies may results into bigger one, especially in accepting the results of the election. According to them, the parties and candidates may resort not to accept the results with all these controversies build around the election.
“The result of this election may end in a controversy and I see it as something that will end in a legal battle. The court may decide the election”, Barrister Phillips Adedeji quipped.
Chinedu Akabuogu, a civil servant said the controversies are as a result of fear of failure by candidates and their parties. He said supporters of these parties are afraid of the other and in so doing any policy meant to prevent rigging, violence and free and fair elections are seen as the other as a plan to rig them out by the other party.
“The controversies you are talking about its normal in any election because the fraudulent ones are afraid of failure, so everything is opposed”, Akabuogu stated.  It’s a lack of trust and confidence in the INEC, the incumbent president by parties and its connected to fear of unknown”
Anike Charles, National President of the Eastern Union, a social political group opined that since Nigeria’ independence in 1960, the Country has witnessed several elections which always were characterized with controversies during and after the elections. He said perhaps the most controversial, so far was the 1966 general election which its controversy resulted to first Military coup.
According to Anike, another topical controversial election in the past was the June 12, 1993 Presidential election. But he however stated that the 2015 forthcoming elections are generating same; if not much more controversies than the previous experiences and that this was due to some number of reasons- “the do or die stand of the for most of the oppositions. Anike blamed the opposition group for most of the controversies engineered by their leaders of the opposition parties. He explained that their desperate power- seeking approach is what is causing the arguments.
“They are taking the undue advantage of the gentleman- attitude of President Jonathan. Some of them even openly and publicly insult the President and often some of them use some threatening and inciting words which of course encourage some of their supporters to violence to the extent that the several times, the convoy of the Presidents have been attacked in some States”, he added.
“Another reason for controversies in the 2015 election is the kind of negative utterances of some elder-statesman. Most of them keep issuing inflammatory statements; while some has resulted to indecent actions, largely due to frustrations. The state of insecurity and fear of possible outbreak of violence have resulted in millions of people returning to their home states. Even foreigners are moving out of the Country in their large numbers”.
Anike said it was for the above reasons that his group have joined numerous voices calling on federal government to ignore the agitation of some mischief makers who are opposing the use of the Nigerian army to beef up security on the election days.
“The need for adequate security of lives and property during and after elections cannot be over emphasised. Government must realize that its primary assignment to the citizenry is to protect lives and property; therefore must not heed or succumb to those seeking opportunity to inflict pains on ordinary citizens or looking for slightest opportunity to blame the federal government”, Anike explained.
“The services of the Nigerian army are very necessary for internal security as guaranteed by the Constitution. The state of insecurity and fear of possible violence have resulted to many citizens returning to their home states and even foreigners are moving out of the Country for fear. This is why we also join numerous voices calling on the federal government to ensure adequate security of lives and property by employing the services of the army on the election days to forestall possible violence”.
It would be recalled that the introduction of permanent voter cards and the use of card reader by the Independent National Electoral Commission are generating a lot of controversy, and there is fear that if it is not handled carefully may rubbish this year’s general elections.
Mrs Onwuka Duru said controversy is part and parcel of Nigerian politicians’ life and they enjoy it as long as it lasts. She said they adopt all forms of controversy to either destabilise or discredit each other and in so doing earn sympathy of voters.
 Recently, the atmosphere has been fraught with accusations and counter-accusations on the introduction of permanent voter cards, PVCs and the use of card readers, CR, by the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to conduct the elections. The ranging controversy has divided the supporters of the two major political parties with the two expressing holding different views.
The INEC said that the use of the PVCs and CR would stop multiple voting by ensuring that only owners of the PVCs could vote at designated points where their PVCs were programmed to.
But the Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, weren’t convinced on INEC arrangement on the Card reader even as the device had been used in mock elections held on Saturday, March 7, in 12 states of the federation.
 The technology was reported to have recorded mass failure in three states including Ebonyi and Niger States. According to a statement attributed to INEC, the exercise recorded 59 percent success rate. This is why the PDP insists that 41 percent failure rate of the card reader in only 12 states was unacceptable wondering what will happen if the device is used in the 36 states plus the federal capital territory.
The PDP Governors’ Forum, which met at an interactive session with the media and civil society organisations in Lagos, on Tuesday, March 10, expressed reservations at the use of the device and overall preparedness of the INEC for the elections.
Akpabio, chairman of the PDPGF, said Lagos, was chosen in recognition of its position as the headquarters of the media and activism in Nigeria.  On the PDPGF opposition to use of the PVC and CR, the governor said.
 “The INEC appears ill-prepared for the 2015 elections. For example, at the time the polls were shifted due to security concerns, more than 23 million registered voters had yet to collect their PVCs and you know there are some countries with populations of about just three million. Twenty-three million would amount to disenfranchising more than five West African countries in their own elections. It will be recalled that even the INEC chairman (Attahiru Jega) admitted on the floor of the Senate that over one million PVCs had yet to be printed in far away China”.
“According to the INEC chairman, the postponement was a blessing in disguise. How then can Nigerians reconcile the purported readiness of INEC for the February 14, election with the testing of card readers more than a month after the postponement? More than three weeks after the elections have been shifted; they are then testing the card readers that would have been used. Given the failure rate of the card readers during the recent mock exercise, it is apparent that many Nigerians will be disenfranchised even when they are registered to vote.

“We re-assert that on no account should any registered voter be disenfranchised for non-possession of PVC even when the person has a TVC when it is not due to one’s own personal fault; even when the card reader has rejected or refused to recognise the thumbprint or the battery is dead and there is no electricity in that area to charge it.
However, the All Progressives Congress, APC, the main opposition party, on its part, said it was satisfied with the device and urged the commission to go ahead with the use of the card readers.

Governor Rochas Okorocha of Imo State and chairman, Progressives Governors’ Forum, accused the PDP of plotting to stop the conduct of the general elections on March 28 and April 11. Okorocha, who spoke through Chinedu Offor, commissioner for Information, Imo State, on Wednesday, March 11, faulted the claim by the PDPGF that the INEC was ill-prepared for the polls.
 “They (PDP members) want to do everything to stop the elections. They have come up with all manner of excuses. The PDP is on a fishing expedition. If they are not talking about card readers, they are talking about insecurity. How can they be talking of the INEC not being prepared? They know they have lost the confidence of the Nigerian electorate. They have seen the handwriting on the wall.

“The questions to ask are: Is the INEC ready? The answer is yes. Are Nigerians ready? The answer is yes. Is the APC ready? The answer is yes. Have people collected their PVCs? The answer is yes. All over the world, not all eligible voters vote in an election. The international community is ready and watching.”Okorocha stated.
Another APC governor in support of the use of the device is Babatunde Fashola of Lagos State. Fashola alleged that the decision by the PDP governors to reject the use of card readers for the next elections was antithetic to democracy.
The controversy over the use of PVC and CR is not likely going to end soon until Jega finally make up his mind before next week election. A group, which called itself the Middle Belt Concerned Youths, said it was against the use of the device because it would not guarantee free, fair and credible elections. Yusuf Amodu, leader of the group, told journalists that the mock election conducted by the INEC revealed that the card readers were prone to fraud and capable of causing problems on election days.
But the group’s feared was not accepted by another Group, the Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room, which commended the mock accreditation in 12 States, held on Saturday, March 7. While commending the exercise, the Situation Room said it was fairly successful and passed the integrity test, which made it worthy of commendation.
In spite of the claims by the INEC, that it has recorded complete success in the distribution of the Permanent Voters cards (PVCs) in the three volatile north-eastern states in Nigeria, the case is different. The poor distribution of the PVC is still generating disagreement among party lines.
INEC’s claims that it has achieved near hundred percent in the contentious distribution of Permanent Voters Cards (PVC), especially
Borno and Yobe states, residents of the states are claiming otherwise
There were reports of lack of PVCs in Maiduguri Metropolitan Council (MMC) as well as in Maisandari ward, which is unarguably one of the largest in Nigeria.
It could be recalled that last week, INEC said upon several protests by concerned residents, who were worried that they could be disenfranchised by not having their PVCs, extended the collection of PVC till next week.
Before now, the election postponement controversy was topic for political analysts. On Saturday, 7 February, 2015, the Chairman of INEC, Attahiru Jega announced that the elections have been rescheduled from 14 and 28 February 2015 to 28 March and 11 April, 2015 respectively. The decision to postpone the elections was made amidst controversies arising from the slow pace in the production and distribution of Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs). 
Colonel Sambo Dasuki (retd), National Security Adviser to the President, kick-started the postponement when he mooted the idea after delivering a lecture on the 2015 elections and the security situation in the country at the Chatham House in London.
 Before this time, Jega had insisted that the elections would go on as planned. But after a National Council of States (NCS) meeting was called on 5 February, 2015 to review the level of preparedness for the elections.  However, the NCS meeting did not call for the postponement of the elections, it asked INEC to consult with stakeholders in order to take an appropriate decision.
It was gathered that the office of the NSA had, in a letter, informed INEC that security could not be guaranteed during the earlier proposed period of election in four North-East states of Borno, Yobe, Adamawa and Gombe, which are facing Boko Haram insurgency.
The NSA and all chiefs of the armed and intelligence services unanimously reiterated that the safety and security of INEC’s operations could not be guaranteed, and that the security services needed at least six weeks within which to conclude a major military operation against the insurgents.
 They also explained that during this operation, the military would be concentrating its attention on the theatre of operations such that they might not be able to provide the traditional support they render to the police and other security agencies during elections.
Eventually, during the announcement of the postponement, Jega argued that the election had to be postponed “after carefully weighing the suggestions from briefings held with different stakeholders in the electoral process.”
Since the postponement, the shift has been highly raised dusts among many Nigerians who alleged foul tactics by the Presidency and the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), the ruling party to rig the election.
The common argument by some Nigerians was that if the security agencies have not been able to address the security challenges posed by Boko Haram in more than six years, what guarantee would they offer that they would return stability to the North-East in six weeks.
Following the postponement was the use of soldiers to conduct the election. The House of Representatives, the lower chamber of Nigeria's National Assembly in which the opposition are again the majority party weighed on the role of security forces in conduct of election and rose against it.
All Progressives Congress’ (APC) caucus leader Femi Gbajabiamila argued that the use of the armed forces in the elections should be restricted under a provision of the country’s Constitution.
This action occurred just days after the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) met with Nigeria's security agencies – including the armed forces, intelligence agency, police forces and the state security service. INEC explained that the meeting was merely a routine one, to discuss the respective agencies' risk assessment.
The planned deployment of military personnel to provide security at the 2015 polls also attracted divergent reactions from the major stakeholders in the electoral process. While the opposition All Progressives Congress, APC, interprets the proposal as a ploy by the ruling People’s Democratic Party, to use the military to rig the coming polls, PDP on the other hand insists that the purpose is to ensure credible and violence-free polls.
One major concern, which has dominated political discourse in the country since the postponement of the 2015 general election by the INEC, on February 8, is the issue of the planned deployment of military personnel to man the coming elections. The opposition All Progressive Congress, APC and the ruling People’s Democratic Party, PDP, have particularly been at loggerheads over this issue.

Those who are opposed to the idea argue that such an act amounts to an aberration. For such people, it is only the police that are constitutionally empowered to provide security at the polls. Even at that, such police personnel ought not to carry arms in discharging such a responsibility. Citing certain provisions of the Electoral Act, proponents of this course further argue that in the event that police-bearing arms are involved in the conduct of the polls, such police officers are by the Act restricted to some distances from the polling booths.
However, those who argue in favour of deploying the military on election days raise the issue of insecurity as a predisposing reason for doing so. To support their position, such proponents point to the general insecurity in the country, which expose the lives of electoral officials and party agents to grave danger during elections.

According to them, military presence at strategic locations on election days restricts rigging of the polls through ballot snatching and irregular movement of election materials by politicians
Many believes that the success of the recent gubernatorial elections in Edo, Anambra, Ekiti, Osun and Ondo States, were because of deployments of the military which was applauded by the public and said the decision by the Federal Government for the deployment helped greatly in ensuring the successes achieved during those elections.
In Edo and Osun, where the APC won the elections, the party was quick to commend the military for saving the days for them. In Ekiti State where the PDP carried the day and Ondo State where the Labour Party, LP, won the polls, as well as Anambra State where the All Progressive Grand Alliance, APGA, was the winner, those electoral successes were credited in great parts to the presence of the military, which frustrated any forms of planned rigging in those states.
What is however causing the heightened concerns over the proposed deployment of the military in the March and April polls appears to be the recent revelation and the alleged release of a tape, purporting to contain details of the plot by the military and some bigwigs of the PDP on how the Ekiti State gubernatorial election was allegedly rigged with the collaboration of the military.
The APC has been consistent and unequivocal in opposing the plans by the Federal Government to deploy the military on election days across the country. The party maintains that far from the reason of ensuring violence free polls as is being mounted by the PDP, the ruling party has other sinister purposes for the military.
APC to press down their argument, sent a letter dated February 16, 2015 to the INEC Chairman, Professor Atahiru Jega, formally stating its opposition to the matter. APC also backed the letter up with accompanying legal authorities from both the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal.
The letter, which was written by the Director, Legal Services of the APC Presidential Campaign Council, Chukwuma- Machukwu Ume (SAN), was addressed to Jega, copies of which were also made available to President Goodluck Jonathan, the National Security Adviser, the Chief of Defence Staff, the Chief of Army Staff, Chief of Naval Staff, Chief of Air Staff and the National Chairmen of the APC and the PDP.
APC in the letter called the attention of the Federal Government to a judgment delivered on January 29, 2015 by Justice R.M. Aikawa of the Federal High Court Sokoto and another by the Court of Appeal, Abuja, on February 16, 2015 which overruled the use of military in elections.
The letter read in parts, “I am sure all well-meaning Nigerians share your deep seated concern on the militarisation of our elections. It is therefore imperative your good office and commission ensure, henceforth, and until there is an enabling Act of the National Assembly, the court orders are obeyed and armed forces personnel are never again deployed in any form of security supervision of our elections.”
Justice Aikawa of the Federal High Court in his judgment on the suit marked: FHC/S/CS/29/2014 among others, restrained the President and Commandeering- Chief of the Armed Forces of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and INEC “from engaging the service of the Nigerian armed forces in the security supervision of elections in any manner whatsoever in any part of Nigeria, without the Act of the National Assembly.”
On its part, PDP continued to maintain that the planned deployment of military personnel on election days across the country is simply to ensure that there is no form of electoral violence, such that were witnessed in the country in 2011, particularly in the north, which claimed the lives of many innocent Nigerians and the destruction of properties.
According to the party, the reason that the APC and its leaders do not want soldiers deployed is to be able to intimidate voters and unleash violence on the polity once they lose the elections.
PDP National Publicity Secretary, Mr. Olisa Metuh in a statement said the position of PDP clear on the issue. He also called on INEC to collaborate the necessity of the security in view of its past experiences in conducting elections in the country.
 “We want adequate security measures to be put in place for the polls. The deployment of security is for the INEC to decide. The PDP is not a security agency or the electoral umpire. Whatever INEC and the security agencies decide on we are going to abide by it,” Metuh said.
PDPPCO Director of Media and Publicity, Mr Femi Fani-Kayode, stated that “The attempt by the APC to discredit the use of soldiers by promoting some misleading audio footage of the so-called rigging during the Ekiti governorship election, in which one Captain Sagir Koli was the dramatis personae, is childish and absurd.”

According to Fani-Kayode, “The Federal Government deployed soldiers in the Anambra, Edo, Ondo, Ekiti and Osun gubernatorial elections and all those elections were devoid of violence. Remarkably, the APC won in Edo and Osun; APGA won in Anambra; LP won in Ondo while PDP won only in Ekiti State.”
He said, “The basis on which the APC is agitating for the exclusion of soldiers from the election, by sponsoring court cases, is patently dubious and untenable. The reason that the APC and its leaders do not want soldiers deployed is to be able to intimidate voters and unleash violence on the polity once they lose the elections. They know that it would be far more difficult for them to do that when soldiers are on the streets.”
Some groups and individuals are already expressing opposition to the involvement of the military in the coming polls. This is apparently in such peoples’ suspicion that President Goodluck Jonathan hopes to use the military to aid his re-election attempt. Those who are opposed to military deployment plan appeared to be ignorant of the fact that the country is sitting on a keg of gun powder.
Political analysts said that there was no known law that excludes the military from being involved in civil rule; rather, the Nigerian constitution empowers the military to carryout responsibilities in aid of civil authorities, in addition to its primary duty of protecting the country from external aggression.
The Nigerian Army and Air Force have made it clear that they are ready for the elections. Both the land and air troops are ready to provide a conducive environment for the electorates to vote on the election days. The military has also assured of safe movement of sensitive electoral materials as well as electoral officers. The military has never said that it would supervise elections as it is never its duty, rather the Nigerian Army through its then Director of Army Public Relations, DAPR, Brig-Gen. Olajide Laleye, said they would provide support for the polls.
“Equally, the Nigerian Army seizes this opportunity to reassure Nigerians of its preparedness to support relevant agencies in the successful conduct of the 2015 general election”.

Can Jega’s troubleshooting Card Reader end electoral fraud?






There are indications that the INEC officials may go to their polling centres with generators to power the batteries of the Card Readers when they go down, Emeka Ibemere reports.
The planned use of new biometric voting technology in Nigeria’s general elections which holds on March 28, and April 11 has become a troubleshooting one.
It’s expected the every Nigerian voter is supposed to cast his permanent voter card, which stores biometric information such as fingerprints and facial image.
 At the polls, the voters will present their cards and a voter card reader would verify their names on the voter roll and the authenticity of the cards. But this novelty, first of its kind, has become highly criticised.
The Card Reader that the INEC is bent to adopt in next week’s election has its disadvantages as well as its advantages. It was gathered that the battery life span of the Card Reader lasts about six hours at 95 per cent full and this may have created fears about the longevity of the device's battery life in an election that has millions of voters throughout the country.
The battery is a specialized battery and coupled with low power supply and lack of power in some states of the country, there are indications the INEC officials may go to their polling centres with generators to charge the batteries when they go down.
Moreso, are the facts the in some remote areas, there may be no big shops that could sell such batteries and even where there are such stores, the restriction of movements and businesses during elections may results in not using card readers in some areas.
Before now, Nigeria had used the Automated Fingerprint Identification System all her polls. In 2011, the system created a digital register to eliminate double voting, and was not capable of verifying the identity of voters at the polling stations.
 However, the Independent National Electoral Commi8ssion, INEC, believes that these new Card Reader would bring additional benefits, especially in preventing double votes and ballot stuffing.
According to the Chairman of the INEC, it was designed to replace the old culture of identifying electorates.
Observers appraised the fact that the system is safer but raises fears because not many countries in Africa have employed biometrics to verify voters’ identity on Election Day.
It would be recalled that in 2012, Ghana tried to use even more sophisticated system, and equipped polling centres with fingerprint scanners. Kenya tried to do the same in 2013, but the result was a spectacular disaster. According to experts, the population of voters that Nigeria’s INEC must manage is much larger than the one in Ghana; moreover, Ghana’s Electoral Commission is known for its strength, professionalism and integrity.
Political pundits in Nigeria in their argument said the introduction of biometrics would not only reduce fraud and make elections rigging-free, but it would also make contested election results and electoral violence less likely.
A recent report by the Electoral Integrity Project found voter registration the third most problematic component of the electoral process worldwide. According to the report, almost every election is characterised with reliability of the voter register, allegations of double voting and votes by under-ages and illegal aliens.
 The fears expressed by Nigerians in some quarters were that the new technology could be misplaced. But the fact remains that Card Reader if eventually introduction could help solve some problems, such as double registration and double voting.
Martin Okenwa said the use of Card Reader doesn’t entirely eliminate rigging in an election. He said technology doesn’t offer solution for other electoral malpractices and can even generate new problems. A report said with Card Reader, a candidate that loses election cannot contest electoral results.
INEC had claimed that the new reform in the voter registration and identification system was intended to address the lack of trust among political parties, especially rigging problems associated with election.
It would also recalled that when Ghana used biometrics as an important way of restoring the public’s confidence in the electoral process, after their controversial 2008 elections, when they first used it in 2012, their Electoral Commission had to extend voting by one day following the failure of some verification machines. Computer analysts and researchers told our correspondent that voting machine breakdowns and had suspicious patterns.
The insistence of the INEC boss to go ahead with card reader technology is causing ripples in the polity, especially between the Peoples’ Democratic Party, PDP and the strong opposition party, the APC.  According to the PDP, who has consistently opposed the use of card readers, the voter card readers would fail to work properly, certainly possible in a country with frequent power cuts.
Meanwhile, Inter Party Advisory Council (IPAC) marched around Abuja, Nigeria’s Federal Capital Territory (FCT), in a bid to educate the masses on election ethics. The Group moved around to distribute election’s code of conducts, produced by the INEC to citizens.
The council spoke on the need for the INEC to ensure it provides enough card readers during the polls. The council said in a press conference tagged “No PVC, No Election; No Card Readers, No Election”, that the time for rigging in the country is over.
It would be also recalled that the INEC had shown its readiness for forthcoming general elections, by conducting a field test on card readers which was alleged to be a failure.
PDP Presidential Campaign Organisation and some political Parties had rejected the use of card readers during the forthcoming general elections.
According to them, the use of card readers is a ploy to disenfranchise citizens in the coming elections. Meanwhile, a Federal High Court in Abuja, had refused an application brought by four registered political parties, seeking to restrain the INEC from using card readers in the conduct of the general elections.
The United Democratic Party, Action Alliance, Allied Congress Party of Nigeria and Alliance for Democracy, told the court through their counsel, Alex Izinyon, that the proposed use of the card readers was contrary to the provisions of the constitution, as well as the amended 2010 Electoral Act.
In the suit, the political parties challenged the powers of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to introduce a process not specifically provided for in the constitution, as it prepares for the rescheduled polls.

However, in his ruling on the exparte motion, the trial judge, Justice Adeniyi Ademola, noted that the political parties had shown that they had legal rights, showing that the case is triable, but observed that the parties would not suffer any irreparable harm if the electoral body is given the opportunity to be heard before the interim orders being sought could be granted.
Meanwhile, PDP has accused the All Progressives Congress, APC, of cloning Permanent Voters Cards, PVC, ahead of the general elections.
The national deputy chairman of the ruling party, Mr Uche Secondus, said that the rejected PVCs during last weekend’s mock card reader’s exercise had substantiated what the Department of State Services (DSS) said about the APC cloning of voter cards in Lagos State, Nigeria’s commercial city in the south-west. The INEC had subjected the card reader machines, which it planned to use in the forthcoming elections, to test to see if the device could be trusted during the elections. But the commission detected some cloned PVCs which failed to pass the card reader test during last week’s exercise in Port Harcourt and Osun State.
While the INEC was yet to officially announce its position on whether to go ahead with the use of the device, several political pressure groups, including the PDP are insisting that the errors recorded during the card readers’ test are too huge to be neglected.
But the spokesman for the APC, Mr Lai Mohammed, said the allegations were inanities and that the party would not respond to such claims.
 “As a government in waiting, we are busy investing our time and energy finding solutions to the myriad of problems and hardship occasioned by six years of President Jonathan’s failed administration.” He advised Nigerians not to listen to PDP governors as most of them, according to him, have nothing to offer the country again.
Recently, Department of State Services (DSS) raided the APC’s office in Lagos, taking away materials which it later said showed that there was an elaborate plan by the APC to inflate its membership data ahead of the February 2015 general elections.
However, INEC, allegedly expressed satisfaction with last week’s field-testing of card readers, planned for use in validation of voters in the March 28 and April 11 general elections.
The electoral body said in a statement that the exercise, held in 12 states from the six geo-political zones of the country, was successful and would prove useful during the elections. It however acknowledged challenges in confirming finger prints.

The statement came amid controversies between the rulings Peoples Democratic Party, PDP, which opposes the use of card readers during the polls and the opposition All Progressives Congress, APC, which backs the policy. INEC says the cards will help combat electoral fraud.
The electoral body said it achieved 100 per cent success in its objective of verifying the authenticity of the Permanent Voter Cards presented by voters.
On the biometric authentication of voters, INEC conceded that only 59 per cent of voters who turned out for the demonstration had their fingerprints successfully authenticated. However, the Commission allayed fears of disenfranchisement of voters, saying provision for manual validation had long been put in place for such cases.
“The Commission, in agreement with registered political parties, had provided in the approved Guidelines for the conduct of the 2015 elections that where biometric authentication of a legitimate holder of a genuine PVC becomes challenging, there could be physical authentication of the person and completion of an Incident Form, to allow the person to vote,” the statement by spokesperson, Kayode Idowu, said.
“The card readers’ test showed the devices could help generate data essential for research and planning purposes. The Smart Card Readers provide disaggregated data of accredited voters in male/female and elderly/youth categories – a disaggregation that is vital for research and planning purposes, but which INEC until now had been unable to achieve. The demonstration on Saturday fully served this objective”.
The electoral body said the card readers were able to send data of all accredited voters from polling units to the Commission’s central server, thereby checking attempts at fraudulent alterations.
However, the test-run in Ebonyi State would be repeated on as the state recorded that highest number of cases of failed fingerprint validation.
The Commission said it “took a serious view of the high rate of the SCRs’ failure to authenticate voters’ fingerprints in some areas, particularly in Ebonyi State, and has decided to thoroughly investigate the cause; as well as repeat the public demonstration in that state.
“This demonstration will be conducted in the particular Registration Area involved in the last exercise, namely Izzi Unuhu (Abakaliki Local Government Area); as well as in Ibii/Oziza Registration Area (Afikpo North LGA). The repeat demonstration will be on Saturday, March 14th 2015.”
Despite the failure of the card readers’ field test- run in some states, a coalition of civil society organisations, Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room, has thrown its weight behind INEC on the use of card readers and permanent voter cards for the forthcoming general elections.
The group said its observation of test run showed that the exercise was highly successful. Situation Room said the exercise passed integrity test and was commendable.
“On the basis of the test and assurances of improvement, Situation Room calls on the full use and deployment of the Card Readers and PVCs for the 2015 Nigeria general elections,” it said. “It observed that “the card readers functioned properly with occasional connectivity issues and the verification process of the PVC was almost seamless.”

The group noted the fact that there were reports of delays and challenges in authentication of fingerprints, but added. “However, people were asked to fill incident forms, which did not stop them from being accredited but slowed the process”.
Situation Room urged INEC to improve on areas where it had challenges in the course of the Saturday’s mock election.
Situation Room said INEC should improve on voter education and civic orientation; biometric authentication process; transportation of electoral personnel, especially in the rural areas; and issue of discrepancies of details on the PVC and the card reader in a way that the Card Reader could be reconfigured in a timely manner so as to avoid disenfranchisement of any voter.
It was gathered that Lagos, Awka, Ado-Ekiti, Abuja, Abakaliki, Asaba, Minna, Port Harcourt where test-run of the Smart Card Readers by the INEC in mock elections conducted across selected states of the federation recorded marginal success, as the exercise was tainted with technical hitches.
Reports from the 12 states where the system was tested showed that, while the machine operators did not arrive at the designated polling units on time, the operations took quite some time, thereby causing a lot of delay.
Fortnights ago, the field-testing of the Smart Card Readers were held in 225 polling units and 358 voting points across 12 registration areas (wards) in 12 states of the federation.

The wards are in Port Harcourt City (Rivers); Abakaliki (Ebonyi); Ado Ekiti (Ekiti); Gassol (Taraba); Kumbotso (Kano); Bunza (Kebbi); Kokona (Nassarawa); Shiroro (Niger); Ikeja (Lagos); Aguata (Anambra); Oshimili South (Delta) and Jama'are (Bauchi).
But, when asked to comment on some of the hitches recorded during the mock election, especially reports that 42 per cent of eligible voters were not cleared, Kayode Idowu, Chief Press Secretary to INEC Chairman, Attahiru Jega, said: "Record available to INEC indicates less."
Report from Awka, the Anambra State capital, had it that the card readers were put to test at Igboukwu Ward 1, Aguata local government of Anambra State, which has 22 polling units. INEC officials, who arrived the polling units as early as 7.00am were disappointed that the electorate did not come out until about 8.30am.
It was however observed that the efficacy of the card readers used during the exercise was contested following the duration of time it took to accredit a voter. Though the time varied, it took average of 10 seconds and 20 minutes for a voter to receive accreditation.
Reports from the field show that the card reader rejected the finger prints of the voters in most cases, indicating 'verification failed.' This is after identifying the permanent voters’ cards as being authentic.
Speaking with journalists, the Anambra State Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC), Edwin Offor Nwatarali, attributed the inability of the machine to capture the finger prints on time to greasy or dirty fingers of the voters.

Corroborating this, the Senator representing Anambra South Zone, Andy Uba, who observed the process, said the card readers were working perfectly and would help to conduct a very credible election.
However, Secretary of Inter-Party Advisory Council (IPAC) in Anambra State, Isaac Onuka, said the use of the card reader may mar the election. He called on INEC to return to the manual ways of accrediting voters as the use of the card reader may lead to confusion and delay in the process. Chris Azor of the Civil Society Observation Room wondered why INEC should use the card readers now. "In most cases, people had to scrub their hands on the ground just to ensure that the machine recognises their finger prints", Azor said.
However, the All Progressives Congress (APC) in Ekiti State described as successful test-run of card readers by INEC. APC Publicity Secretary, Taiwo Olatubosun, said in a statement that the exercise in Ado-Ekiti allayed the fear of failure of the machine during accreditation, noting that the result achieved through the technology marked the end of over-voting and impersonation problems that dented the credibility of the nation's electoral process leading to litigations that tasked contestants' finances.
Former Commissioner for Tourism under ex-Governor Kayode Fayemi's government, Ayodele Jinadu, and ex-Chairman, Ado Ekiti Local Government, Sunday Ibitoye, described the exercise as a huge success, which cannot be easily compromised by poll riggers.
On the contrary the PDP said the result of the test-run of the card readers has proved that the challenges attached to the use of the equipment is enormous and therefore cannot be used for the election as it is.

PDP National Publicity Secretary, Olisa Metuh, in a statement, said that field reports showed that myriads of problems showed up at various centres, confirming its (PDP's) apprehension that the technology cannot be deployed now.
According to him, series of lapses recorded at across the states where the test run were carried out include, but not limited to "non-verification of voters' fingerprints even after authenticating their PVCS; slow accreditation process as a result of poor internet server operations in some locations; and apparent inadequate knowledge of the card readers by both INEC officials and voters".
"The worrisome fall-out from the test vindicates earlier widespread calls by stakeholders that the card readers should be thoroughly tested to ascertain their workability for free, fair and credible elections before being deployed for the actual polls," Metuh stressed.
Anayo Chukwu told Newswatch Times on phone that he watched the exercise, and that it took about 30 minutes and in some cases, more was to be done.
According to Chukwu, the Card Reader proved its efficiency only during verification, which is done within a minute but added that major challenge posed by the card reader was that it did not recognise the fingerprints of people who registered during the 2011 general elections.
 He said the card readers are recognising only those who registered recently and those whose fingerprints couldn’t recognise were those who registered in 2011.

At Nkaliki Echara Primary School 003, the registration officer, Iheanyi Okiyi, expressed worry over the delay experienced by the Card reader to carry out authentication of PVCs belonging to voters in the polling unit.
In Delta State, stakeholders expressed mixed reactions over the mock testing of the smart card readers. The exercise was conducted in Ward 04 comprising 14 units spread across Asagba Primary School and Niger Mixed Secondary School, Asaba in Oshimili South Local Government Area of the state, which has a total of 3,624.
Although, there were incidents of failed attempts in capturing biometrics of prospective voters, the exercise was generally successful, as it took a maximum of 30 seconds to accredit one voter.
The state Commissioner for Justice, Charles Ajuyah, who represented Governor Emmanuel Uduaghan, lauded the exercise, but urged INEC to work on the machines to eliminate incidents of failure of biometric capture on Election Day.
In Lagos the mock election accreditation exercise held in Onigbongbo ward, Ikeja local government area of Lagos State
The process was hitch-free across the 50 polling points pencilled for the testing of the smart card readers, however, the voters turn out was poor. However, the timing of accreditation and verification through the smart card readers experienced a few hitches.


INEC REC in Lagos, Tunde Orebiyi, told journalists after the exercise that the demonstration of the workings of the smart card reader is a new technology aimed to improve accreditation and electoral process.
"The smart card reader is able to recognise INECs PVC there is none that has been presented today that was not genuine, that is the first measure.
In Portharcourt, Udensi, who was at the State Primary School, Orominike stated that though there were some minor challenges in the exercise, it would not affect the use of the items during the elections. Also, an INEC staff at Units 4, 5, 6 and 7 in Orominike State Primary School, said the card readers were hanging while trying to authenticate eligible voters' data.
It was reported that in Niger State, 42 percent of eligible voters with PVCs were not cleared by the card reader machines. According to INEC in the state, only 52 per cent were cleared as authentic.
The National Commissioner INEC, Chris Eyimoga, disclosed the figures from the 18 polling units in Gwada ward, Shiroro Local Government Area of Niger State, adding however that a total number of 10, 243 persons are registered voters with only 1,799 authenticated by the card reader.
PDP governors said they are opposed to the use of the machine because it has proved to be ineffective and a burden to the accreditation process.
The governors vowed to scuttle any attempt by the INEC to use the devise in the March 28 and April 11 elections.
In Abuja the Conference of Nigerian Political Parties (CNPP) expressed its support for the use of Card Reader for accreditation of voters in the 2015 general elections. Mr Osita Okechukwu, CNPP National Publicity Secretary in a statement noted that the mock test of the Card Reader conducted by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), had further emboldened and reinforced its resolve to adopt the device.
It, however, urged INEC to take note of the `few lapses’ observed during the test and improve on the device to engender free, fair and transparent elections.
"We are making this declaration because in the absence of genuine reason, we adopt a device which has been used to conduct free, fair and transparent elections in many countries."

The statement said that CNPP concurred with valid evidence that the use of the Card Reader for accreditation of voters would minimise if not eradicate snatching of ballot box. It added that the device would also minimise thumb printing of ballot papers and snatching of result sheets.
"Accordingly, we take exception to political parties that are wittingly or unwittingly against the deployment of Magnetic Card Reader," the statement said.
Investigations showed that such card readers could as well be snatched like they do with ballot box.
 A former Deputy National Chairman of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP), Chief Olabode George, urged the INEC to ensure there are enough card readers as back-up per polling unit in case of failure.
"It is brilliant to come up with the card reader. But INEC must come up with two, three or four systems per polling unit as back up instead of saying people will vote the next day in areas where it fails. There are millions of polling units across the nation which means millions of untested card readers for the Permanent Voter Cards (PVCs). Asking people to come back the second day may lead to chaos”, he stated.
"We must also envisage what may happen if the machine fails to read people’s cards. All these must be taken into consideration in order to avoid crisis”.
The PDP chieftain noted that if the cards were swiped and did not work, it could spark off the violence that Nigeria wanted to avoid at all cost.
"This election will be the first after our 100 years as a nation. We must guarantee that it works. Nigeria cannot afford any experimentation at this stage. What I have just explained is logical and not partisan. Those making the card reader issue a partisan issue must remember that the nation's continued unity must come before our individual interests”, he stated.
"This was similar to the controversy that trailed the postponement of the election. If Nigeria had gone to election on February 14, millions of Nigerians would have been disenfranchised. This election will define the future of this country".
Former Military President, General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida, also threw his weight behind the use of card readers for the upcoming general election. Babangida, in a statement by his media office, said the card reader was a novel innovation worth trying. He heaped praises on the Independent National Electoral Commission for bridging the technological gap in the country. He said in the statement: “We must appreciate the creativity and innovation of the card reader which INEC has introduced to make for better election credibility and transparency. In a digital world where almost everything is driven by technology, the offer of the card reader is a welcome development. We may not get to the fullest merit of this, but it is a good way to start. This is one way to bridge the technological gap between those developed and under-developed nations of the world. Let us repose confidence in the system in the interest of the unity of our great country.”
 “Let me state in emphatic terms that Professor Attahiru Jega and his colleagues in INEC have to be encouraged, motivated, animated and commended for the sheer courage and determination they have shown thus far in their preparations for the March 28 and April 11 elections. They have demonstrated their sense of patriotism in a manner that underscores their readiness for the elections and love for country. Rather than condemnation, they deserve our commendation...”
A card reader is a data input device that reads data from a card-shaped storage medium. The first were punched card readers, which read the paper or cardboard punched cards that were used during the first several decades of the computer industry to store information and programs for computer systems. Modern card readers are electronic devices that can read plastic cards embedded with either a barcode, magnetic strip, computer chip or another storage medium.
Alternatively referred to as a media card reader, a card reader is also hardware device that lets you read and write data on a memory card such as a multimedia card. Some card readers only have one card slot, and some have multiple card slots for different cards and media. These cards use encryption and authentication technology which is more secure. The microprocessor chip embedded at the heart of the smart card requires contact to the card reader and certain areas of the chip can be programmed for specific industries.
The cards can be used for identification to prevent fraud to ensure the right person is votes. It is used to identify who have been given PVC permits. This has the potential to reduce electoral fraud.
When used correctly for identification purposes, they make the jobs of law enforcement and INEC easy.