Emeka Ibemere
Inspite of
the shift in the general election date to more six weeks, from February 14 to
March 28, to be precise, tension, fear and uncertainty continued to hover over
Nigeria’s political landscape.
The worse
and the new fears are that the heated tension could provoke military
intervention.
The fears
rose when the decision by Nigeria's electoral commission to postpone the
upcoming general election due to security concerns over the Boko Haram insurgency
nearly brought the country closer to a political crisis.
“The Nigerian media are not helping the
situation, Chijioke Anyanwu, a media consultant in Lagos State, told our
correspondent”.
“Honestly speaking, Nigeria media is fanning
the embers of fears and uncertainty especially in this year’s election. They
have been used to heat up the polity”.
The Independent
Electoral Commission, INEC, announced its decision last week, Saturday to annul
the earlier February 14th date citing the military's assessment of security
in the troubled zones of the country as excuse adding that they wouldn’t
guarantee security because of the newly announced military operations in
Nigeria's troubled north-eastern states.
But cynics
and opposition parties view the extension as a decoy by the sitting President
Goodluck Jonathan, who is facing fierce battle from main opposition party
candidate Muhammadu Buhari not to handover in May 27th , 2015.
Fears grew
more last week, when rumours started frittering in that the President had asked
the INEC boss to proceed on indefinite leave of absence after he was accused of
shifting the election to enable PDP rig the poll.
According to
opposition party APC, if elections are delayed yet again, the government could
end up holding power past the planned leadership transition on May 29. This
however, could lead to political impasse, threatening its already fragile peace
and leading to major economic fallout, a replica of the June 12 election.
“The
postponement suggests desperation on the part of President Jonathan, who has a
very strong contender to beat in the person of General Buhari, who has a
nationwide support,” says Richard Akinola, a public affairs analyst.
Supporters
of Mr. Buhari are questioning the security threat reasoning, and argue that the
delay solely benefits the president.
“I ask
Nigerians to question why these service chiefs decided to launch a major
operation a week before the election,”
Sen. Bola
Tinubu, a leader of the opposition party, said in a statement Monday.
“What is new
about the security situation in the last two weeks that has not been there
these past years? The date and importance of the election was well publicized.”
However, President
Jonathan seems to have poured cold water on the tensed minds of Nigerians by
promising that May 29, the date by which the constitution mandates a new
president must be installed, is “sacrosanct.”
“INEC’s decision ought to not generate
acrimony since it acted within its powers under the law and in consultation
with all relevant stakeholders”, Jonathan said in a statement.
Human rights
lawyer Femi Falana admits that the INEC acted within its constitutional powers.
But he accused Sambo Dasuki, the national security adviser who has called for a
delay for weeks, of committing a ‘coup’ against the constitution.
Mr. Falana
warned in a statement that if Boko Haram is not contained before the new date,
the election might be postponed indefinitely, paving the way for an interim
national government.
Other
experts say the delay gives the government more time to court local governments
and reaffirm uncertain loyalties exposed during the campaign. State governors
and local senators are keys in ensuring a presidential win and shifting
loyalties have left Jonathan's camp in a precarious position.
On his own, Buhari
made it clear that his party would not accept another shift. “Our hope is that
with this rescheduling, the security services will do their best to ensure that
the security environment needed for safe conduct of the 2015 elections is
rapidly put in place,” he said.
Professor
Attahiru Jega, the electoral commission chairman, is hopeful that necessary
steps would be taken to hold the election.
Meanwhile many
Nigerians, especially those in the worst-hit northern states, are sceptical of
the government's capability to root out Boko Haram in such a short period.
Mazi Nze Nwabueze, a business man in Borno
State said he is afraid of the election. Nze Nwabueze was in Idumota, Lagos
Island to buy baby wears, said he has sent his family to Aba in Abia State for
safety and would only rejoin them a week to the March election.
Mounting
tension was the scene of soldiers who were allegedly stationed for a three-day
siege to the Ikoyi, Lagos home of All Progressives Congress (APC), National Leader
Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu. It was also gathered that a military team stormed
the Imo State Government House in Owerri, deploying an armoured tank.
The two
incidents raised the fear of Nigerians about the impending crisis the election
was going to generate in few weeks from now.
APC have
raised the alarm of a likely compromise of the military by the PDP to rig the
elections. The PDP and the military have, however, denied the allegation.
In a
statement, the Tinubu Media Office said: “For three straight days, the private
residence of the national leader of the APC, Bola Tinubu, has been under
surveillance by battle-ready and helmet wearing soldiers”, the statement reads.
“Numbering
close to 30 and riding in three patrol vans and an army truck stationed close
to the entrance of the gate to Tinubu’s house on Bourdillon Road in Ikoyi, they
have become a permanent feature. Their obvious targets, Tinubu, himself and
perhaps the hordes of politicians and visitors that visit his Bourdillon
residence”.
“The soldiers
were first noticed on Sunday, a few minutes to 11pm in an army truck. They were
stationed about 500 meters away from Tinubu’s gate. Later, they moved close to
his gate as if making efforts to enter. The stern looking soldiers were around
for hours on Sunday and returned on Monday to continue their surveillance.
Monday night about 10.45pm, they returned to the residence in two army vans and
were there throughout the night. Some of the soldiers discharged from the van
and walked back and forth in front of the house and around the house in what is
clearly some casing effort.
“This
morning (Tuesday), two vans from the army were stationed on both sides of the
house along Bourdillon Road, their missions shrouded in secrecy.”
Meanwhile
Bola Tinubu said he would not be intimidated by the show of strength,
intimidation and possible harassment.
“I remain resolute in my advocacy and support
for the rule of law. Jonathan’s government has through the service chiefs
staged a coup against Nigerians and the Constitution and now wants to silence
his critics. I will not be muzzled through the barrel of the gun. The guns and
bullets they should use to defeat Boko Haram are now being turned against the
opposition and innocent Nigerians,” he said.
The
statement added: “The exact mission of the soldiers is not known but it fits
clearly into a new pattern of intimidation of leaders of the APC and the
opposition.
“It might be
part of a broader plan by the Jonathan presidency to intimidate Tinubu and his
political associates and scare him from making statements or building a broad
coalition against the government as he did during the NADECO days.
“As the
scaremongering by the army continues, Nigerians must come to the realisation
that the military has abandoned its statutory role and have now been dragged
into partisan politics. Nigerians and the South West should hold the
Jonathan-led military responsible if any harm or danger comes to Tinubu and his
family. The case of the ‘Unknown Soldier’ is too recent in our memory.”
But the General
Officer Commanding (GOC) 81 Division, Major – General Tanmi Dibi, said his men
were on regular patrol across the state. He said the Army at the weekend began
its routine “show of force” which, is an exercise embarked on whenever there is
election.
He debunked
the allegation that soldiers laid siege to Tinubu’s residence, arguing that
Governor Fashola was aware of the ongoing patrol across the state.
“How can
anyone accuse the army of laying a siege to Bourdillon or Asiwaju Tinubu’s
place? That is most untrue. Soldiers attached to the security outfit Operation
MESA and other task forces have been on general patrol across the state. He
said the entire Ikoyi, Victoria Island and Lekki are being patrolled.
According to
him, even on the Mainland, his men have been patrolling. “They have been keeping awake while the masses
are asleep to ensure that we continue to enjoy the peace and security we have
in Lagos. Even the governor is aware of these patrols or is he now saying he
does not like the efforts being made by security agencies in the state? Is he
saying they don’t like the peace and security we have been working hard to
sustain? He queried.
“Politicians
must endeavour to leave the army out of politics. It is not good when soldiers
are doing their best and different meanings are read into their action. “I am
not saying it is not possible my men stopped at Bourdillon. There is the
possibility they must have stopped there in the course of their patrol but that
does not mean they have been deployed there or have invaded the place.”
In Imo
State, there was also an allegation that the Federal Government deployed
soldiers in Owerri. The report said the soldiers were stationed at strategic
areas including Assumpta Cathedrals junction and Isu junction. The solders are
with their camp beds, decked in full military fatigue with armoured tanks. Imo citizens were said to be in tensed mood
and are afraid that the deployment wasn’t in preparation for announcement of
the state of emergency in the state.
But Cosmas
Ukwuoma, director of publicity, Ken Ojiri Campaign organisation told Newswatch
Times on phone that there wasn’t anything like siege at the Imo State
government House by soldiers and said that the APC is crying wolf. He said its
APC’s campaign of calumny to curry favour from Imolites adding that the wicked
and the corrupt are afraid of themselves. Ukwuoma said there is no military
tension in Imo. According to him, it’s a routine military exercise each
election year for armoured tanks to be stationed at the strategic places for
security purposes.
Inspite of
the accusation against the military, the Nigerian military has vowed to stay
out of politics surrounding the country’s upcoming presidential election amid
claims that it said it could not guarantee the election commission chairman’s
security unless the army got six more weeks to contain the Boko Haram.
"It is
important to reassure Nigerians that the military will remain professional,
apolitical and non-partisan in all operations related to” elections,
Major-General Chris Olukolade, a Nigerian defense spokesman, said in a
statement.
Major-General
Chris Olukolade accepted that there was palpable tension being generated with
regards to the roles of the Nigerian military in the ongoing political
activities and recent developments, especially in relation to electioneering.
The Nigerian
military’s alleged plans of interfering with the election became known when
Attahiru Jega, chairman of Nigeria’s election commission, said the office of
the country’s national security advisor wrote him a letter that the military
couldn’t guarantee his safety unless he postponed the Feb. 14 election.
Even as the
federal government and her security agencies continued to assuring Nigerians of
peace and violet-free election, non-indigenes fear poll shift backlash in northern
Nigeria.
While Ndigbo
leader in Plateau States assured all Igbo residents in Plateau that the
election was going to be peaceful. But
the tension hovering around the election and its ethnic sliding the poll is
shaping into are not quite assuring.
Last week
Sunday in the Northern part of Nigeria, there was noticeable poor attendance in
churches in the Kano metropolis with Christian faithful and residents, mainly
non indigenes stayed away. Investigations revealed that majority of
non-indigenes, mainly Igbo-Christians, had fled over fears the shifted general
polls may ignite violence.
Reports say
that Our Lady of Fatima Catholic Cathedral in the Sabon Gari area of the
metropolis, populated by the non-indigenes, showed that only few faithful
attended Sunday service, with scanty and empty chairs everywhere in a church
which hitherto recorded hundreds.
The incident
was noticed few days to the earlier scheduled February 14 election which was
later postponed. But despite the extension, the towns looked scanty as shops
were seen locked. Some have relocated their kids to south-east even as school
calendar were yet to be completed.
It was
gathered that at normal period in the church, the Cathedral administrator
usually organizes three church services on Sundays. But within the last two
weeks, this has reduced to two, with the first mass holding from 7 am to 9 am,
while the second and last mass for the day commencing from 9 am to about 11 am.
Sabon Gari
Area of the metropolis, where over 80 per cent of Igbo Christian worshipers are
located showed a similar situation, with less and less people in service.
From reports
made available to Newswatch Times, over 70 per cent residents of Igbo
extraction were said to have relocated from the city, with commercial
activities dwindling considerably.
As law
enforcement agencies are alleged to have been appealing to the non-indigenes
not to relocate, as their security would be guaranteed before, during and after
the general elections
It was
further gathered that some of the southerners that still remain in the city are
very apprehensive and they said they are troubled by phone calls from
relatives, telling them to either come home or tread cautiously because of the
evident high insecurity in the north.
An Igbo leader
in Jos, Plateau State, Onye Ndu Ndigbo, Chief Samuel Achi, advised Igbo
residents in the state not to panic over their safety during and after the 2015
general elections, saying adequate security has been taken to guarantee their
safety.
He advised
them to stay where they are and exercise their franchise and not put themselves
into greater risk by running away on accident-prone roads.
Achi said
the community has gotten adequate assurances from the police and all the
security agencies in the state to safeguard their lives and properties, adding
that it would be futile leaving their means of livelihood and running away
because of election.
“It makes no
sense leaving where you have been living for many years to your village where
you go once in a while. It is better you stay and defend your investments.
Those who are encouraging you to run away only have eyes on your investments.
We should learn a lesson from what happened in 1993 during the annulment of the
MKO Abiola election when many people lost their lives in avoidable road
accidents,” he said.
He noted
that having registered in their various places of residence, their voter cards
would be a waste if they failed to use them, adding that “wherever you may
chose to run to, remember that you may not be totally immune from witnessing
any political violence as every other part of the country could be vulnerable.”
Achi also
called on them, especially Igbo youths, to remain peaceful and law abiding and
report any suspicious movement around them to the law enforcement agencies.
An
ex-Nigerian president is worried the country’s military is steps away from
taking power. Olusegun Obasanjo also warned the government not to give the
military an opportunity to return to power.
In the
meantime, the country remains on tenterhooks after the independent electoral
commission delayed the elections for six weeks until Mar. 28. Obasanjo’s concern is that postponing
elections because of an unpredictable security situation could lead to further
delays. If a new government is not sworn in by May 29, it would trigger a
constitutional impasse, allowing the military to take control via an interim
government.
The
uncertainty has led to speculation and rumours in Nigeria that the military,
which has ruled the country for more than half of its 54 years since
independence, would make an unwelcome return, fuelling tension in the land.
“I sincerely
hope that the president is not going for broke and saying ‘look dam it, it’s
either I have it or nobody has it’. I hope that we will not have a coup. I hope
we can avoid it,”
Obasanjo told a foreign media.
Meanwhile,
on Wednesday 11, President Goodluck Jonathan tried to pour cold water on the
tensed atmosphere when he held a media chat with select journalists to discuss
among other things, insecurity in the North-East, the economy, elections,
corruption, and other challenges being faced by Nigeria as a nation.
On elections
postponement, the president sought the understanding of the international
community over the postponed elections. He said the kind of scenarios where
elections are postponed for the sake of perpetuating power is not the case in
Nigeria.
On the war
against Boko Haram, Jonathan said the government has just acquired new weapons,
and gotten support of neighbouring countries to fight Boko Haram. He mentioned
that Chad waited for African Union approval, which they recently got too. He
also mentioned that the issue of security is beyond Boko Haram. The president
said it runs into dangerous signals of youth restiveness. In the next four
weeks, he said Nigerians would see the difference in the security intervention
in the North.
Jonathan
said he never sacked Jega and that he has confidence on the INEC Chairman. “I
wish Jega was here, I would have asked him to answer whether I have confidence
in him. Yes, those who called for his sack may be close to me, but they
expressed their own opinion. More than 80 per cent of those who sponsor
messages on our behalf we don’t even know them. People use the rescheduling of
the elections to misinform Nigerians”, President added.
“I have
never thought about removing INEC Chairman, though I have the constitutional
power to do so.” Jonathan blamed his supporters for rumours about Jega’s
resignation.
“I have not
told anybody that I will remove Jega,” he said. He explained that if there were
obvious reasons to remove Jega, he would rely on constitutional provision that
gives him powers to sack whoever he appoints.
“The level
of misinformation, especially from young people is high. Attempting to attack
the president is treasonable offence. The president is protected by soldiers,
not just the police. People get carried away and make some provocative
statements.
Those who
pelted my convoy during my campaigns in the Northern parts of the country were
ignorant. If INEC conducts the election poorly, it will be on my head.”
According to
the President, hate speeches and political violence by both opposition and
ruling party members are fuelling tension in the land.
The President
explained that, “some people get carried away” by the political play and exudes
this violence. He blamed aides and associates of key political actors for the
hate speeches and political violence. He did not categorically condemn the hate
speeches or war threats or politically-motivated violence.
“We will
make sure things are done so that nobody goes to war,” the president said when
he pressed for categorical stance on the war threats by ex-militants should he
lose the elections. He argues journalists have responsibility to ensure the
unity of the country.
The Presidents
said the new dates are sacrosanct and a new president would be sworn in by May
29. He argued that the goal is not to totally eliminate Boko Haram but to make
adequate security arrangement for the election. Cooling the tension, the
president said he would hand over if he loses the next election. “If the
elections are conducted and I lose, of course, another President would be sworn
in,” the President said. He argued that Nigeria is more important than any
individual. President Jonathan assured Nigerians that elections would be
conducted and a new president sworn in on May 29. He argued that it is better
for INEC to conduct an election everyone would be happy with.
No comments:
Post a Comment