EFCC Press Release
The arraignment of Barrister Chike Charles Ononye
before Justice Mbonu Nwenyi of the Anambra State High Court, Onitsha by the
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, EFCC, for offences bordering on
stealing and issuance of dud cheque on Monday, November 3, 2014 could not go on
as planned.
In what appeared like a drama, no fewer than 30
lawyers were in court to demonstrate their solidarity to their colleague and to
protest against the arraignment of the accused, claiming that the case should
be settled out of court.
Ononye’s ordeal started when he was reported to
the EFCC through a petition by one Kenneth Ndejiobi over a case of stealing and
issuance of dud cheques.
According to the complainant, Ononye was engaged
sometime in 2006 to manage his properties situated at Onitsha,
Anambra State.
The accused person allegedly stole the sum of one
million, forty one thousand, six hundred naira (N1, 041,600.00), part of the
money he collected as rent over the complainant’s property.
The accused person in a bid to defray the said
sum, in the first instance, issued a UBA cheque in the sum of four hundred and
eight thousand naira (N408,000.00) and another UBA cheque in the sum of six hundred
and thirty three thousand, six hundred naira (N633,600.00) both of which were
returned unpaid due to insufficient funds.
Consequently, the accused person issued another
UBA cheque in the sum of four hundred and eight thousand naira (N408, 000.00)
which also suffered the same fate as the ones earlier presented.
When the case was called, counsel to EFCC,
Mainforce Adaka Ekwu urged the court to take the plea of the accused person
adding that the charge against him is a criminal matter.
However, Barrister A. A. Ononye, who announced his
appearance on behalf of other colleagues for the accused person, pleaded with
the court for an adjournment to enable both parties to settle out of court. He
said, as friends of the court they would do every thing possible to ensure that
the matter is resolved amicably between the two parties.
Ekwu objected vehemently to the request for out of
court settlement describing it as an attempt to frustrate the trial of the
accused person. He said, “Lawyers have no immunity to criminal investigation
and prosecution”.
When it appeared to the opposing lawyers that the
judge was not persuaded by their pleas, they changed tactics and objected to the
arraignment on the ground that the charge brought against the accused person is
incompetent and that the court has no jurisdiction to entertain it.
Justice Nwenyi has adjourned the matter to
November 20, 2014.
Wilson
Uwujaren
Head, Media & Publicity
4th November, 2014
No comments:
Post a Comment